X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:43:42 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from bmw.hapgoods.com ([65.40.217.234] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTPS id 1117156 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:37:41 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.40.217.234; envelope-from=matt.hapgood@alumni.duke.edu Received: from HP780N (HP780N.hapgoods.com [192.168.2.138]) by bmw.hapgoods.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4HDajCT004638 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:36:50 -0400 From: "Matt Hapgood" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Lean test results - 360 X-Original-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:36:48 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <00ce01c679b6$f540ef00$8a02a8c0@hapgoods.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CF_01C67995.6E2F4F00" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-index: AcZ5XofeW3TgMoCESV2Ugie6pp1/5AAWFp6w In-reply-to: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00CF_01C67995.6E2F4F00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lasar's timing is proprietary. I have no idea. Matt _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George Braly Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:04 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Lean test results - 360 Not that cool. What is the timing when the CHTs are at that level ? _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Matt Hapgood Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 8:53 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Lean test results - 360 Walter, Look at the CHTs in this chart. Matt _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Walter Atkinson Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 6:59 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Lean test results - 360 Why were you trying to get CHTs UP? How cold were they? Walter ------=_NextPart_000_00CF_01C67995.6E2F4F00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lasar's timing is proprietary.  I have no=20 idea.
 
Matt

From: Lancair Mailing List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George = Braly
Sent:=20 Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:04 PM
To: Lancair Mailing=20 List
Subject: [LML] Re: Lean test results - = 360

 

Not that=20 cool.

 

What is the = timing when=20 the CHTs are at that level ?

 

 

 

From:=20 Lancair Mailing List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of=20 Matt Hapgood
Sent:=20 Monday, May 15, 2006 8:53 PM
To: Lancair=20 Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Lean test = results -=20 360

 

Walter,

 

Look at the = CHTs in=20 this chart.

 

Matt

 

From:=20 Lancair Mailing List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of=20 Walter=20 Atkinson
Sent:=20 Monday, May 15, 2006 6:59 PM
To: Lancair=20 Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Lean test = results -=20 360

Why were you trying to get CHTs UP? How cold = were=20 they?

Walter

<= ?/color>
------=_NextPart_000_00CF_01C67995.6E2F4F00--