Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #35952
From: glong2 <glong2@netzero.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Positive Crankcase Vacuum
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:03:35 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

Doug:

 

Here is my experience with crankcase vacuum.

 

I installed the oil vent with a ¾” tube ground at about a 30 degree angle to the wind velocity to give a crankcase vacuum. I had a lot of oil on the belly and I speculate the oil/water/air mixture was sucked out before it could condense on any metal surfaces.

 

I installed a homemade oil condenser between the crankcase and the outlet tube and collected little oil/water products in the condenser drain. Was my flow too high for the condenser?

 

I then changed the angle of the outlet tube to about 10 degrees. The oil on the belly was less and I collected less than a teaspoon of condensate in the condenser after a two hour flight.

 

I have now made the outlet flat with the belly but have not flown since the modification. I am expecting less oil on the belly. As far as the power is concerned, I doubt if I am changing crankcase pressure enough to notice it – more testing to come.

 

Eugene Long

Lancair Super ES

glong2@netzero.net


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Douglas Brunner
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:02 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Positive Crankcase Vacuum

 

Thanks for the comments.

 

I hope to be able to judge for myself the increase in horsepower on a dyno.  Mike Moore of AvWorks has extended to me the

offer of being able to run my engine (under close supervision) on a dyno after it is built.  I am looking forward to this for many reasons,
not the least of which is being able to see exactly how much horsepower I am getting.

 

The other benefits you mention are nice as well and you forgot to mention how nice and clean the belly of my plane will look.

 

D. Brunner

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster