X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:40:27 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.pshift.com ([63.166.217.30] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1077847 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:17:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.166.217.30; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt (unverified [216.57.118.156]) by mail.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.3.459.0) with SMTP id for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:15:55 -0400 X-Modus-BlackList: 216.57.118.156=OK;colyncase@earthlink.net=OK X-Modus-RBL: 216.57.118.156=OK X-Modus-Trusted: 216.57.118.156=NO X-Original-Message-ID: <033c01c66712$bbb28930$b710020a@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] CHT X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:15:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0339_01C666D8.0EE8BA60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0339_01C666D8.0EE8BA60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I wouldn't so easily dismiss it. If you make a statement like "cylinders are designed to run near 400 df" = you COULD supply some information like what the clearance is when = running at 330 and what it is at 390 and why you think that is better. = or "in a lab test two sets of cylinders were run at these two different = temperatures and blow-by was reduced by 20% when running at the higher = temp". The LOP "religionists" can make such statements for every claim they = make. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Paul Lipps=20 To: Lancair Mailing List=20 Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 9:49 AM Subject: [LML] CHT From the recent postings about CHT, I can see that this discussion = lies in the realm of religion, politics, and LOP vs ROP! There are = disciples and there are disciples, each with a very reasoned tale, full = of a lot of sense, about why you should follow this particular path to = salvation, self realization, and glory. So pick which one resonates with = your own heartfelt beliefs, ignore the others as the rantings of the = deranged, and be happy! ------=_NextPart_000_0339_01C666D8.0EE8BA60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wouldn't so easily dismiss = it.
If you make a statement like "cylinders = are=20 designed to run near 400 df" you COULD supply some information like what = the=20 clearance is when running at 330 and what it is at 390 and why you think = that is=20 better.   or "in a lab test two sets of cylinders were run at = these=20 two different temperatures and blow-by was reduced by 20% when running = at the=20 higher temp".
 
The LOP "religionists" can make such = statements for=20 every claim they make.
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Paul=20 Lipps
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 = 9:49=20 AM
Subject: [LML] CHT

From the recent postings about CHT, I can see = that this=20 discussion lies in the realm of religion, politics, and LOP vs ROP! = There are=20 disciples and there are disciples, each with a very reasoned = tale, full=20 of a lot of sense, about why you should follow this particular = path to=20 salvation, self realization, and glory. So pick which one resonates = with your=20 own heartfelt beliefs, ignore the others as the rantings of the=20 deranged, and be happy!
------=_NextPart_000_0339_01C666D8.0EE8BA60--