X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:31:21 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.240.34] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 1037991 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:18:11 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.34; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from OFFICE ([68.110.252.196]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060318041723.ZKAR3108.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@OFFICE> for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:17:23 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <00fd01c64a42$dba7ebf0$6501a8c0@OFFICE> From: "Bill&Sue" <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2 cooling problem X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:17:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Jerry, I think that you missed Johannes point completely. I believe that he was using the airspeed gauge to measure the differential PRESSURE above and below the engine, not the airspeed. Bill Harrelson > Gary/Johannes, > > I think that you are making a very common mistake in reversing what you > actually want. Remember that Total Pressure is a constant, and: > Total Pressure = P+1/2 x rho x Vsquared, > > where P = static pressure, rho = density and V = speed. > > The result is that static pressure increases when airspeed decreases, and > vice versa. > > So what you want is low airspeed on the forward face of the cooling fins, > and high airspeed behind them. This way you have a positive pressure > differential which reduces cooling drag and improves the cooling. This is > the opposite of what we intuitively feel, which is that high speed before > the cooling fins is desirable. We generally reduce the speed by having > expansion room in the manifold, so that the air gets a chance to slow > down. We can increase speed behind the fins by restricting the airflow > through a nozzle, but you do need some room for the air to stabilize > before restricting its outlet, and it is difficult to arrange in practice. > > EAA published a good explanation of this some time ago, and I posted it on > the List under "Engine, Prop, Cowling" in the Attachments section. I just > checked and it is still there. > > By the way you have made a really good looking manifold. Larry Henney did > something similar on his 360, and achieved excellent results. I hope that > this helps. > > Jerry >