Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #34944
From: <CustomACProp@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: MT Prop for Legacy
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:43:34 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Hi Colyn,
 
I've flown in a Harmon Rocket 2 with the Lyc. 540 engine.  There was some vibration with a 2 blade Hartzell propeller.
We installed a 3 blade Rocket propeller (the MTV-9-B/198-52 MT Propeller), and the engine seemed to have been replaced by an electric motor.
We then installed a different 2 blade Hartzell propeller, and the original vibration was back.
 
John Harmon has flown both the same MT 3 blade propeller and a 4 blade propeller on his Harmon Rocket 3.  John said the 4 blade propeller was slightly smoother than the 3 blade propeller.
 
MT Propeller says there is a 2nd order harmonic present with a 2 blade propeller that is not present with the 3 blade propeller.  I believe there is a 3rd order harmonic with the 3 blade propeller that isn't present with a 4 blade propeller.
 
Regards,
Jim Ayers
Less Drag Propucts, Inc. - An MT Propeller distributor and FAA MT Propeller repair station.
Custom Aircraft Propellers - MT Propeller sales of custom designed propellers
 
PS I will have a 4 blade counterweighted blade MT propeller on my Harmon Rocket 2.
 
In a message dated 03/15/2006 9:46:15 PM Pacific Standard Time, colyncase@earthlink.net writes:
Kevin,
    I have no experience with the MT.
    However, some observe that a 6-cylinder engine makes 3 pulses per
revolution and so does at 3 blade prop.
    So a 4-blade might be less apparent noise and vibration.   I have not
personally experimented with this but maybe some on the list have.

Colyn
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster