X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:55:44 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 1025456 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:48:20 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.8; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.3.) id q.2b3.5ce9d53 (3866) for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:47:29 -0500 (EST) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <2b3.5ce9d53.313edae1@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:47:29 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: TSIO550 differences X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1141735649" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5300 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1141735649 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Columbia web site has a couple misprints. The 400 has the TSIO-550C and the chart shows a TSIO-550N, which doesn't exist. Mike Easley -------------------------------1141735649 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The Columbia web site has a couple misprints. The 400 has the=20 TSIO-550C and the chart shows a TSIO-550N, which doesn't exist.

Mike Easley

-------------------------------1141735649--