X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 01:20:09 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from gateway1.stoel.com ([198.36.178.141] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 1023225 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 00:07:47 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=198.36.178.141; envelope-from=JJHALLE@stoel.com Received: from PDX-SMTP.stoel.com (unknown [172.16.103.137]) by gateway1.stoel.com (Firewall Mailer Daemon) with ESMTP id 04C82EB35E for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:06:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from PDX-MX6.stoel.com ([172.16.103.64]) by PDX-SMTP.stoel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:06:55 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Pinpoint GADAHRS X-Original-Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:06:55 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <17E9FE5945A57A41B4D8C07737DB6072038913E5@PDX-MX6.stoel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: lml Digest #1530 Thread-Index: AcY/evIV2z3XTSXSTaezNK9YsymxjQAlkU3w From: "Halle, John" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2006 05:06:55.0804 (UTC) FILETIME=[9F9C2FC0:01C64012] Well now that we found their website, we know that they think highly of = themselves and that they are too busy or important to talk to mere = pilots but we know almost nothing else. Who are these guys? What = design process went into their product? Has it been tested? Has it = been used in actual flight by normal pilots in a variety of a/c with = different EMI issues? I assume Direct To tested the 425ex before = selling over 100 of them but that didn't prevent their having a problem = that led them to publicly flame an established and reputable = manufacturer. Why do they (or anyone else) think this product will = work. I certainly hope it does but the history of non-certified low = cost AHRS suggests that there are typically some growing pains, even = when the product is made by an established AHRS vendor. Are we hearing = all this hype because the product hasn't had an opportunity to fail YET = or is there something that only dealers and other important people are = being told? FWIW, about 8 hrs on my 420 and not a hint of a problem yet.