In a message dated 3/2/2006 11:23:41 P.M. Central Standard Time,
hwasti@starband.net writes:
I have
nothing against a device like the Battery Minder, but lets put a few things in
perspective. A battery is an expendable, not an investment. If you
fly IFR, it needs to be in top shape so it can get you out of IMC and on the
ground in a reasonable amount of time in the event of an alternator failure.
Sure, you can lower your flying cost by squeezing another year or two
out of a battery, but what are the savings and what is the risk?
The
safe thing to do is to change the battery every year -- 2 if you are feeling
brave. Trying to extend the life of a battery is fool hardy. In
the worst case, all that a Battery Minder will do for you is to increase the
value if your estate by $5.
Hamid,
You must have missed much of the discussion about batteries that have
occurred over the last few months. The objective is to keep the battery at
its' rating over whatever time period one chooses to use it - even as short
a time as the first year of use.
While it may seem that these devices are used to raise the dead, their
better use is for maintenance.
We have learned that there are many SLA batteries (including Glass Mat),
definite brand preferences (sometimes by emotion or reputation rather than
test and use) and definite differences between brands and purposes. Some
individuals are interested only in cold cranking power, some in holding up heavy
emergency power loads for a shorter time period, and some in lesser
starting loads, but longer delivery times for smaller loads (essential bus,
backup power). Have no doubt that there are different implementations
to satisfy such different requirements.
I agree, the batteries in my airplane (main/essential and EI
backup) are not expendable when I am flying.
For certain batteries, Battery Minder and/or Battery Tender can be used to
maintain them to deliver the rated power for each and every flight the
batteries are used, whether it is for 1 year, 4 years or even many years
after retired from their aviation service. A battery's service life can be
limited by dormancy, repeated excessive discharges and charge cycles -
not necessarily just time in use. A battery maintainer can improve
the odds your battery will not fail you halfway thru your next flight.
This is the safe thing to do.
A battery depleted by the master switch left on may be recoverable
because the master relay couldn't stay held in to a complete discharge.
Leaving the essential bus switch on for a week will completely kill a
battery because it will suck every electron out (to keep the gear down and
locked lights on) and never let it bounce up even a bit. One battery may
be restored, the other may spend the rest of its' recovered life (if any)
starting my tractor - top speed is 8 mph close to the ground in rain, sleet, fog
or sunshine.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL
(KARR)
PS Once
again, Experimental Aircraft allow us to choose the best battery for our
requirements - not the STC'd one mandated by FAA regs even if it is
of outdated design and function. Now if we only had a capacity test
that itself did not shorten the life of the battery.