In a message dated 2/26/2006 1:06:11 A.M. Central Standard Time,
N4ZQ@comcast.net writes:
I have
set the gap between spinner and cowl to approximately .175"
all
around. I'd like to close in this gap a bit with an additional
1BID
on the face of the cowl. So, in everyone's opinion, how small a
gap
would be too small and result in eventual contact due to engine
sag?
Angier,
Consider that the engine also moves around from torque
applications.
Think of the problem as diagrammed by an H, where the left vertical
(L) is the distance between the elastometric supports of the
engine, the right vertical (R) is the diameter of the spinner and
the horizontal (C) is the crank length (distance from the mount to the
spinner).
If the engine sags, the displacement, as measured by the leg of a right
triangle, is proportional for each similar triangle formed from the legs of the
H as defined above.
Suppose L=15, R=10 and C=30 (measure for yourself). Let's say
the engine sagged or was displaced 1/2 inch as measured at the spinner.
That is about 1/4 inch at the bottom mount in the same plane (gee, I wonder
why my soft bottom mounts are shimmed 1/4 inch?). How far would the bottom
of the spinner move back? The similar triangle would have a leg of 1/6
inch but the triangle thru the center would make it 1/12 inch.
Oh, also the center back of the engine moved a bit aft when it
sagged - about 1/8 inch (maybe less because the back of the top mount moved
forward, too). So, an EWAG of 5/24 inch is .21 inches or so of
spinner edge movement in the above example. Hmmm, perhaps the gap is a bit
tight - maybe take out a washer to move the spinner back plate a bit forward
(.0625) or fly in primer and fix the cowl scratches, if any, later.
BTW, the exhaust pipes move around in a similar fashion.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL
(KARR)