X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 02:05:48 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [204.13.112.10] (HELO mail1.hometel.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTPS id 997844 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:50:05 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.13.112.10; envelope-from=marknlisa@hometel.com Received: (qmail 18222 invoked by uid 90); 25 Feb 2006 17:09:20 -0000 Received: from dsl-stj-204-13-118-2.stj.hometel.com (HELO MARKNLISA) (204.13.118.2) by mail.hometel.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2006 17:09:20 -0000 From: "Mark & Lisa" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Dangerous Attitudes X-Original-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:49:47 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: Listers, Beware, this is a long post -- you might want to print this and take it to the throne room with you. Last month's issue of Aviation Safety magazine contained an article titled "Rogue's Gallery." I requested permission from the magazine to post the article here on the list, but I received no response -- I'm taking that as a no. I can, however, paraphrase. BTW, I highly recommend a subscription to this publication. It's expensive, but that's because they don't accept advertisers, the magazine is completely supported by subscription costs. Remember the Marine EA-6B Prowler crew that cut a ski-lift cable in Italy back in 1998? They killed a bunch of people and created an international incident. Sound familiar? Obviously we can examine situational awareness, skill and judgment lapses here, but no one can argue that if they hadn't been flying faster and much lower than authorized it would never have happend. Jeff Pardo, author of the article, attributes this accident to "rogue behavior." In the early years of aviation, let's call it the barnstorming era (when there was a lot of experimentation going on), a certain amount of "derring-do" was considered a prerequisite to piloting an aircraft. Through the years we, and the public in general, have revered those pilots who can maintain control of their craft while performing death-defying maneuvers close enough to the ground that we can see. I would hazard a guess that most of us have, at one time or another, availed ourselves of the freedoms flight offers to exercise a little derring-do on our own. The siren song calling us to wheel and soar with the eagles is all but overpowering at times -- it's fun, scary and exhilarating. But let's not forget the reason it's fun, scary and exhilarating; it's also dangerous. In today's insurance- and bureaucracy-driven world of aviation we (pilots) are expected to toe the line, follow the rules, keep the shiny side up, etc., etc. We're also a group of ambitious, determined and capable people who've learned (in the non-aviation world) that sometimes the best way to get things done is to "think outside the box." We (most of us) didn't get where we are in life by always following the rules. Not only are we successful, but we are among a select few that have the courage (temerity?) to learn to fly. Some of us aren't satisfied with even that level of intrepidity and have chosen to BUILD OUR OWN AIRCRAFT! The question is how do we apply our audacity, and what we've learned about success in our non-aviation endeavors, when "soaring and wheeling?" In his book, "The Killing Zone," Professor Paul Craig observes that the typical pilot personality feels a need for independence, excitement, prestige and control. Is it as easy for you as it is for me to see how this can lead to shining one's ass? According to the Nall report (an AOPA Air Safety Foundation statistical examination of aviation accidents and incidents), pilots who engage in low-level maneuvering and flight into worsening weather are still killing themselves (and others) with appalling regularity. Single-engine, fixed-gear pilots seem to favor accidents involving low-level maneuvering over weather 2-1; vice-versa for pilots of higher-performance singles, they prefer weather-related accidents to low-level maneuvering 2-1. Maneuvering flight (mostly buzzing and other related activities) accounts for approximately 25% of all accident fatalities. More than a third of these low-level accidents involved loss of control, a small number (about two percent) involved a power loss and about one in nine were outright low-level aerobatics. In any given maneuvering flight accident, about half involve fatalities. In most serious accidents, judgment is usually involved, whereas it's more a matter of skill in less serious "fender bender" accidents. So where does this leave us? Many of us are still scratching our heads trying to figure out why we are still killing ourselves (and others). Some fear the coming backlash that will most certainly further erode our freedom to engage in one of life's most rewarding activities. Consider these questions: How does temptation foster a bad decision? When does innovation or heroism become recklessness, or even villainy? When should profit and personal gain eclipse safety? When does expanding the envelope become an ego writing a check that one’s experience can’t cash? Mr. Pardo made a list of Rogue Pilot characteristics. This I will post in it's entirety: -- Socially adept, an effective communicator, politically savvy. -- Can use, modify or withhold information for personal gain. -- Believes that he or she is superior, and that the normal rules don’t apply to them. -- Displays far greater skill than discipline. -- Driven by something -- money, fame or their own ego -- to the point behavioral inhibitions are overcome. -- Easily bored with the mundane. -- Usually very popular within their organization, knowing what rules can be broken, when and with whom. -- The “ripple” effect follows them: perceived as a role model within their organization, others are prompted to “try their luck,” sometimes with disastrous results. -- Their behavior exhibits progressively larger deviations from what is usually perceived as “normal,” “expected” or “safe.” Please keep in mind that I point no fingers save the one pointing at myself. If we accept the premise that we should strive to be the safest, most professional and effective pilot possible, then each of us must KEEP that finger pointed at ourselves. We must constantly survey our reasons and motives for our decisions and behavior. If even a whiff of one of these characteristics is apparent in our self-examination then we owe it to ourselves, our passengers, a freedom-loving pilot community and innocent bystanders on the ground to CEASE AND DESIST IMMEDIATELY! The discussions on this list have covered a plethora of angles related to this topic: skill in low-level/high-speed maneuvering, FAA rules, judgment, training, personal preferences, interference with other air operations, etc., etc. Some say we’re beating a dead horse. Others agree with the message, but don’t like the way the message is shared. I think it’s important that each messenger deliver his or her message in whatever form gets their point across. Every time someone shares an experience or idea we are given a lens through which we can view our own ideas and experiences differently. Sometimes looking at an idea from another’s perspective can give us a fresh opinion of its merits, or lack thereof. If everyone looked at things the same way there would be no reason for discussion! Since we are always (according to Prof Craig) looking for ways to demonstrate our skill and bravery, I suggest this: There is nothing harder than to honestly examine ourselves. After each flight, especially if you have another pilot or even a passenger aboard, consider conducting a post-flight critique. Ask for input from your passenger; they might well have seen something you didn’t (and don't shoot the messenger). Review the flight from flight planning to engine shut down with emphasis on your decision-making and how it affected the outcome. This is the time to nit pick -- no nit is too small. It takes a brave person indeed to examine his or her mistakes and shortcomings -- and an even braver person to accept responsibility to take the necessary steps to ensure they never happen again. Integrity is doing the right thing even when no one is watching. Honor is a gift one gives to oneself. Giving in to temptation is easy, especially when you know you can put on a show. Following the rules takes strength and integrity, especially knowing you'll only impress yourself. Are you strong enough to give yourself the gift of honor? Fly safe and always have a reason, Mark & Lisa Sletten Legacy FG N828LM http://www.legacyfgbuilder.com