Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #34073
From: Farnsworth <farnsworth@charter.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Runway checks, passes, flybys.
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:19:36 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Jeff,
 
I think you have a bit of a case of having your "hair on fire" here.
 
You cite several regulations that support limiting what a person can or can not do with an airplane. I know that you know that the FAA's definition of aerobatic flight is fairly restrictive ( have you ever exceeded 60 degrees of bank with a passenger on board, without parachutes? ). If you have, was that in and of itself unsafe? It was in violation of the rule. 
 
I didn't see where George advocated being unsafe. I think both he and I have done a great deal of flying where "speed is life" was the rule of the day.
 
The FAA rules allow 200 KTS in the airspace around an airport. Since you were quoting rules to show that he is unsafe, I guess if he doesn't exceed 200 KTS he is within the rules and by definition, safe.
 
Would flying an ILS low approach followed by an acceleration to 200 KTS to a closed pattern to a full stop landing be considered unsafe? I don't think so.
 
Stupid is stupid, but speed does not itself make stupid.
 
Lynn Farnsworth
Super Legacy #235
TSIO-550
Race #44
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster