X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:50:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.89.70.9] (HELO smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f) with ESMTPS id 941070 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:19:29 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.89.70.9; envelope-from=cjensen@dts9000.com Received: from lucky.dts.local (66.83.119.58.nw.nuvox.net [66.83.119.58]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0MEJqwQ007954 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:19:52 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Runway checks, passes, flybys X-Original-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:16:37 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Runway checks, passes, flybys Thread-Index: AcYfIy/en5Im4gkpT+OrJ+bCjBAFBgAOZ2xw From: "Chuck Jensen" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Just another take on the safety issue of hi-speed, lo-alt passes. The safety compromise associated with such passes may not be excessive given familiarity with the facility, proper call outs and all, but to do so consistently calls into question attitude, rather than safety. A local pilot had a habit of doing hi-lo's at a local airport (only incidentally, it was in a Lancair). When he wasn't doing that, he was 'screaming' up and back the grass strip on a pocket-rocket that turned about 10,000 rpms. Despite admonitions from fellow pilots, friend and foe alike, to knock it off, he just didn't see what was wrong. Subsequently, this pilot spent several months in the hospital and his passenger spent three days in a funeral home. Was the high speed pass his undoing? No, but his attitude may have been. After doing some significant engine work (himself) and (allegedly) without a checkout flight, took a passenger on a hop around the circuit. Downwind the engine ran rough, then quit. It turned out that 24 inches was the difference between life and death--literally. That's how far he was from clearing the rock abutment on the end of the runway were it drops off a few feet to the river. =20 There may not be a regulation against high speed passes, there may not be a regulation against doing significant engine work with minimal qualification, there may not be a regulation against taking a passenger on the first flight after important maintenance, but then, there isn't a regulation against dying either. I submit the attitude that provoked one behavior parlayed into a more deadly one. =20 Attitude and decision-making (fully inter-related) has a far greater effect on the safe outcome of a flight than does pilot skills. Chuck Jensen