X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 02:15:30 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f) with ESMTP id 940158 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:15:01 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=TByrnes133@aol.com Received: from TByrnes133@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id q.272.465405d (4468) for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:14:10 -0500 (EST) From: TByrnes133@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <272.465405d.31038da2@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:14:10 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Winglets versus Wingtips X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1137849250" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5301 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1137849250 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Charlie How about stall speed. Did you check to see how much the winglets lowered the stall speed? Tom Byrnes Lancair IV N54TB -------------------------------1137849250 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Charlie

How about stall speed. Did you check to see how much the winglets= =20 lowered the stall speed?

Tom Byrnes Lancair IV N54TB

-------------------------------1137849250--