X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:01:08 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.5) with ESMTPS id 905295 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:41:31 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: (qmail 21202 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 11:40:45 -0600 Received: from ip68-108-237-23.br.no.cox.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (68.108.237.23) by rs5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 11:40:45 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Ignition timing X-Original-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:40:43 -0600 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) Gary: You have included so many variables in your question as to be impossible to answer without putting the engine on a computerized test stand and MEASURING the changes. Based on what I've seen in testing, you might expect a BSFC improvement of somewhere on the order of 0.015 or so if all you do is optimize the thetaPP by timing changes from the magneto setting from the manufacturer. The one thing that you didn't list which plays a big part in the equation is the exact LOP mixture you are choosing--you would have to choose BSFC(min) which changes based on the power setting. That will have a larger effect on BSFC than small timing tweaks. The 25d timing may be good or horrible or anything in between. Without measuring the ICPs, it's impossible to know. Simply saying that all parallel valve engines should have one setting and all angled valves another, is a curious concept. Basically, without some testing DATA, I'm afraid your question is unanswerable---at least by me. Walter On Dec 28, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Gary Casey wrote: All this talk about the relative merits of EI and mags brings up a question that I can't seem to get answered - maybe someone out there knows: Just to keep it simple, I'd like to know the BSFC of an engine (my engine would be even better) running at 20 inches and 2500 rpm, LOP, with the following configurations - dual mags, std timing; one mag std timing and one EI optimized timing; and finally two EI's with optimized timing. To put icing on the cake it would be good to see a timing sweep for each of the cases. And even better a map over more of the operating range, including full power. I've got a parallel-valve IO-540 with 10:1 compression, one LSE-III and my engine builder set the base timing at 25 degrees. He says that he sets all parallel-valve Lycomings at 25, even up to 12:1 and all angle-valve engines at 20 degrees. I'm uncomfortable having the setting at 25, but I have no data to support it. Gary Casey -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/