X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:50:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from esmtp.cave.com ([66.35.72.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.5) with ESMTP id 903824 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:05:34 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.35.72.5; envelope-from=lancair@ustek.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([70.61.176.138]) by esmtp.cave.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v7.2.4.1) with ASMTP id CQN38002 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:04:42 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <43B29B7B.10200@ustek.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:04:43 -0500 From: N301ES Reply-To: lancair@ustek.com Organization: USTEK Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: N320WH Destroyed, No Injuries References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040903030908060707050204" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040903030908060707050204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark Ravinski wrote: > Any form of descent checklist will have you checking the mixture along > the way. Sounds like another good reason to use FADEC. Perhaps some day it actually will be available for the TSIO550. Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES TSIO550 (FADEC-ready) --------------040903030908060707050204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mark Ravinski wrote:

Any form of descent checklist will have you checking the mixture along the way.

Sounds like another good reason to use FADEC. Perhaps some day it actually will be available for the TSIO550.

Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES

TSIO550 (FADEC-ready)

--------------040903030908060707050204--