X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0.5)
  with HTTP id 902342 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:15:44 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Operating over congested areas
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0.5
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:15:44 -0500
Message-ID: <web-902342@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051226205851.1125.qmail@web61314.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20051226205851.1125.qmail@web61314.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Charlie Kohler <charliekohler@yahoo.com>:

  Bryan,
  By "beef" I meant substance or meat of the complaint.  I maintain that in
compliance with 8130.2F we do have authority "as given by the administrator"
  in our operating limitations to counter the restriction in 91.319c.
    I understand your confusion with the phase1 and phase 2 wording. It just
came up in my renewal seminar --the current thinking is that phase 2 may not
be issued and that the airplane would have a phase 1 renewed annually.  Then
if it were issued phase 2 the phase 1 would be expired and be destroyed.
  Charlie K.