X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0.5)
  with HTTP id 901310 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:04:10 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Operating over congested areas
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0.5
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:04:10 -0500
Message-ID: <web-901310@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <000e01c60979$9a20a000$0300a8c0@TabletPC83744>
References: <000e01c60979$9a20a000$0300a8c0@TabletPC83744>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for <bjburr@mwheli.com>:

  Charlie,
  I don't have a beef.  I was only going through a few older messages in the
  list.  I decided to re-read my own ops specs and publish the wording.  It
  was then that the questions arose that I posted.  I wanted to see if there
  are differences in other's aircraft ops specs, to see if the wording in my
  ops specs is consistent with current FAA policies and interpretation.
  
  My only suggestion is that there should be a specific reference to the Phase
  I testing period in paragraph (5) and then the governing language of
  paragraph (24) once entering Phase II for general operations.
  
  Thanks for your help.
  
  Bryan
  N132BB