X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:04:07 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.telcomplus.net ([64.40.39.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 871824 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:59:13 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.40.39.4; envelope-from=jakey@telcomplus.net Received: by mail.telcomplus.net from localhost (router,SLmail V5.1); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:58:18 -0800 for Received: from hoben1 [64.40.39.175] by mail.telcomplus.net [64.40.39.4] (SLmail 5.5.0.4433) with SMTP id ED0FEA716ECD4C80A64345EB977E3F8D for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:58:14 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <001901c5feb7$246a6570$af272840@hoben1> From: "James Keyworth" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Prop choice X-Original-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:58:18 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-SLUIDL: 7E7110F1-1AF54382-9E39B192-6A56F5D1 Bob, are you saying the Scimiter is also 20 lbs lighter, or that it is the same weight as the Hartzell? JHK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marvin Kaye" To: "Lancair Mailing List" Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 7:27 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Prop choice > Oh yes, the eliptical mt prop is 20 lbs lighter than the hartzell. The > scimiter is about the same. Check it out. > Bob Smiley > N94RJ