X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:27:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.4.54.118] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 871094 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:00:34 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.4.54.118; envelope-from=bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:59:50 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 206.173.55.76 by by20fd.bay20.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:59:49 GMT X-Originating-IP: [206.173.55.76] X-Originating-Email: [bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com] X-Sender: bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Bill Kennedy" X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net X-Original-Bcc: Subject: RE: [LML] Prop choice X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:59:49 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2005 00:59:50.0259 (UTC) FILETIME=[30328C30:01C5FDEE] Hartzell has an experimental two-blade prop that was given very good marks by the RV folks in the latest RVator magazine. It was several mph better than the MT for the same fuel flow as I recall. > Hi, >I'm going to install a Lycoming 390X in my 360mkII outbackgear. >Now I have to choose a prop. >I was told a 2 blade Hartzell would be faster than 3 blade MT. >And Hartzell makes the engine run smoother. >What would you reccomend? And what lenght? > >Christian >