X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 22:08:03 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-863285@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3)
  with ESMTPS id 862873 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:27:09 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com
Received: (qmail 8788 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2005 11:26:19 -0600
Received: from ip68-108-237-23.br.no.cox.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (68.108.237.23)
  by rs5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2005 11:26:19 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
In-Reply-To: <list-862802@logan.com>
References: <list-862802@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Original-Message-Id: <7466f4a9f6d8b3fe1dd0eec18d501523@advancedpilot.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Flying in primer question
X-Original-Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:26:18 -0600
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623)


On Dec 4, 2005, at 10:12 AM, Bob Smiley wrote:

I would think that the roughened
surface would offer less overal wetted surface hence less drag.  Does 
this
make sense? Translats to more speed?


Makes sense to me.  Now to TEST it!  <g>