Return-Path: Received: from vc1.videocomm.com ([205.178.100.98]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 19:10:58 -0400 Received: by vc1.videocomm.com with MERCUR-SMTP/POP3/IMAP4-Server (v3.00.15 AS-0098306) for at Wed, 25 Aug 99 16:15:13 +-700 From: "Skip Long" To: "Lancair Builders Mail List" Subject: RE: Closing ES wing Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:11:00 -0700 Importance: Normal Message-Id: <990825161513214600@vc1.videocomm.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Mark, Last weekend I used the Jeffco 9700 on my LIV wing. I sanded the entire inside of the fuel bays and then cleaned with MC. Used shop compressor to blow away all dust. I applied the second coat within two hours of the first. Pot life was only 15 to 20 minutes and only mixed 2 ounces of sealer at a time. Any more would start to overheat before I got it all applied. Temp in my hanger was around 78F. I followed the instructions that were with the sealer from Lancair. Turned out OK. I hope. I am also interested in knowing how much Hysol to apply to the spar. Skip Long LIV, HWD [The subject of allocating the proper amount of structural adhesive seems to be a recurring theme here, and a couple of things immediately come to mind in this regard... first of all, it is unlikely that any two projects will go together identically, so the amount of adhesive required for one person's wing closeout will also likely not apply to another's. With this in mind, the most logical solution calls for the second point, that being to come up with a way to accurately determine the adhesive amount required for each project individually in a relatively quick and easy fashion. The LNC2 builders have a similar situation with trying to ascertain how much foam filler needs to be attached to the stub wing spar tops to take the place of a really thick flox mixture that would likely exotherm and cause adhesion problems somewhere down the road. I believe the approach that I took in this area could be modified slightly to provide an adequate measure of the adhesive volume for a similar area on any other project. I used ribbons of modelling clay spaced about a foot apart to provide me with a gauge of the varying thicknesses required along the spar's length. Apply the ribbons across the spar (front to back), then set the wing skin with weights only over the clay ribbons to get the proper shape on the airfoil. Remove the top skin and the shaped clay ribbons will provide you with depth measurements along the length of the spar. In my case I attached foam between the ribbons and sanded it down to the tops of the bordering clay walls, sort of like screeding concrete. For this application, though, I would think that filling in between the clay walls with sand and then screeding it down to their levels would give one an excellent determination of the volumes all along the way. You could then scrape the sand and the clay into a graduated measuring cup of some kind and be within a few percent of the actual volume required. This is one suggestion, perhaps others out there have similar ideas that would also work as well or better. Just a thought. ] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html