Return-Path: Received: from dskfw2.funb.com ([168.175.254.62]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:29:05 -0400 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dskfw2.funb.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA11312 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clt-msw-02.funb.com(168.175.76.95) by dskfw2.funb.com via smap (V2.0) id xma011017; Wed, 25 Aug 99 10:32:01 -0400 Received: from clt-conn-02.capmark.funb.com (unverified) by clt-msw-02.capmark.funb.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:28:30 -0400 Received: by clt-conn-02.capmark.funb.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:31:55 -0400 Message-Id: From: "Hapgood, Matt" To: "'GBFitz@aol.com'" , lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: RE: Extended Wing Tips Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:31:47 -0400 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > extended wing tips. I was wondering if Tom (or anybody else) had any data > on > long vs. short wing tip performance at cruise above 15,000 feet. The > factory > claims an increase in cruise performance with the long tips, I was just > wondering if this actually pans out in the real world. I spoke with Orin about it, and he seemed iffy about the increased performance at higher altitude. Something about increased drag offsetting any increased lift... Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html