X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:43:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c5) with ESMTP id 771406 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:09:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.35; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r5.5.) id q.e4.7389bb3f (4254) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:08:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:08:35 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Electronic Ignition X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1129586915" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5009 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1129586915 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/17/2005 2:08:44 P.M. Central Standard Time, michael.sasscer@navy.mil writes: I have read several accounts of people using the LSE electronic ignition. Any further updates on how it is going? Has anyone installed or know anything about E-mags? Looks like a compact design. I am running the LSE system on my IO 320 (9:1 pistons) and it has performed as advertised in spite of minor problems with cheap or inappropriate connectors and displays. I have a friend with a blue-printed IO 360 (10:1 pistons) in his Lancair and is quite pleased with his P-Mags. He finds he is burning at least 1 gph less fuel at altitude (above 6000, ie lower manifold pressure) and maybe a bit more fuel at high power settings (high MAP). He has set the P-Mag timing switches to the less advanced position (20 degrees BTDC, I think). He is pleased with their performance/$. Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) -------------------------------1129586915 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 10/17/2005 2:08:44 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 michael.sasscer@navy.mil writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>I have read several accounts of people using the LSE= =20 electronic ignition.  Any further updates on how it is going?  H= as=20 anyone installed or know anything about E-mags?  Looks like a compact= =20 design.
I am running the LSE system on my IO 320 (9:1 pistons) and it has=20 performed as advertised in spite of minor problems with cheap or inappropria= te=20 connectors and displays.
 
I have a friend with a blue-printed IO 360 (10:1 pistons) in his=20 Lancair and is quite pleased with his P-Mags.  He finds he is burn= ing=20 at least 1 gph less fuel at altitude (above 6000, ie lower manifold pressure= )=20 and maybe a bit more fuel at high power settings (high MAP).  He has se= t=20 the P-Mag timing switches to the less advanced position (20 degrees BTDC, I=20 think).  He is pleased with their performance/$. =20
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL=20 (KARR)



-------------------------------1129586915--