Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.ihug.co.nz ([203.29.160.13]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 00:43:03 -0400 Received: from p9-max15.wlg.ihug.co.nz (p9-max15.wlg.ihug.co.nz [216.100.151.137]) by smtp1.ihug.co.nz (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id QAA22713 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:46:35 +1200 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:46:35 +1200 Message-Id: <199908220446.QAA22713@smtp1.ihug.co.nz> To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: John Spry Subject: Ram Air intake X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Has anybody any experience in modifying the air intake and cowling to increase the manifold pressure ? In particular would it be worthwhile to enlarge and extend forward the air intake in the cowling to take advantage of the airflow created by the prop ? I look forward to comments John Spry [I think all the thrashing of the air nearer the prop is actually counter to what you're trying to accomplish... P1*V1=P2*V2... or low pressure times high velocity equals high pressure times low velocity. So the trick here is to get the ambient pressure air coming into the duct's entrance as fast as possible so you can slow it down inside the duct to jack up the internal pressure. Then you have all the losses through the induction system, so you're lucky to have the intake air pres even back up to ambient. I think if you want to boost (hint, hint) the MAP, the only way you can do it is with a pump, like a turbo or supercharger. There is no free lunch and all laws of physics will be strictly adhered to. My $0.02 only, and I freely admit that I might be all wet here by thinking out loud, so all you engine optimization types please jump in and straighten us both out with the straight poop. ] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html