Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:09:03 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-726649@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.36; envelope-from=rickschrameck@cox.net
From: Rick Schrameck <rickschrameck@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Differences between  Epic and Lancair
References: <list-726520@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-726520@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


JOHN,

We have changed our policy about having the plane built at our facility 
only.  We believe that our facility is the best place to help the 
customers build their planes. Our customers now may take their kit home. 
  John, I have a grip. You could have left that snide remark out.  You 
can go to Lancair and build a plane to completion yes or no?   You state 
two differences what is the second?

Rick

Marvin Kaye wrote:

> Posted for "Halle, John" <JJHALLE@stoel.com>:
>
>  I hesitate to respond to a question posed to Brent (who quite clearly 
> has no
> trouble speaking for himself) but, as to differences between Epic and 
> Lancair,
> just for starters here are two:  Lanciar does not require its kits to 
> be built
> at the factory and Lancair does in fact require the owner to be 
> present while
> the kits are being worked on.  Rick, you need to get a grip.  The 
> question you
> should be asking yourself is what difference there is between Epic and 
> Cessna.
>  
>
> -- 
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
>