> The MIDO defined "major portion" as time not task and said to Carl and I
> that the 8000-38 form is simplistic and they were not going to use task.

that's not per their own rules? I'm confused...

if kit_on_approved_list then
  if options_not_on_approved_list_bill_of_sale then look_close ; IVP door
  if extra_help then look_close ; builders_week
  issue_exp_airworthy
else
  look_close_at_8000-38
  issue_exp_airworthy
fi

I thought the kit approved list
http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/rec/ultralights/amateur_built/kits/media/ama-kit.pdf
was "approved data" for Order 8130.2 and form 8000-38 so the kit buyer
didn't have to fill out 8000-38? how can government make a
change without due process?

old IVP wing http://rob.com/mahar/ryan/wing.jpg
legacy wing http://rob.com/lancair/BuildersWeek/day1/wings1.jpg
both are "tasked" as builder made per FAA's kit approved list.

http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/rec/ultralights/amateur_built/amateur_regs/