X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:23:49 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.pshift.com ([63.166.217.30] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 719357 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:01:51 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.166.217.30; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt (unverified [206.229.199.238]) by mail.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.1.361.21) with SMTP id for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:01:02 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <0cd901c5b7c3$ef26cb90$b511020a@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Another way to look at the Innodyne X-Original-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:01:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0CD6_01C5B789.42600A00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0CD6_01C5B789.42600A00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bryan said > I really don't have much experience with the Pratt products. They > didn't do much with helicopter applications except for the BELL 212 = twin > engine aircraft. In comparison the PT6 would be much more expensive = and > much more powerful. I don't think it would be a good fit for the > Lancair aircraft. > =20 > I know that recently a Garrett was installed in a IVP. > =20 Right, I wasn't thinking of putting a pt6 in. I was just trying to get = a feel for the reliability of the RR engine, e.g. in the p210 application. Anyone interested in the Garrett can talk to Mike Custard at = mike@advancedaviationinc.com Colyn ------=_NextPart_000_0CD6_01C5B789.42600A00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Bryan said
>  I really = don't have=20 much experience with the Pratt products.  They
>  didn't = do much=20 with helicopter applications except for the BELL 212 twin
>  = engine=20 aircraft.  In comparison the PT6 would be much more expensive=20 and
>  much more powerful.  I don't think it would be a = good fit=20 for the
>  Lancair aircraft.
> 
>  I = know that=20 recently a Garrett was installed in a IVP.
>  =
Right, I wasn't thinking of putting a = pt6=20 in.   I was just trying to get a feel for the
reliability of the RR engine, e.g. in = the p210=20 application.
 
Anyone interested in the Garrett can = talk to Mike=20 Custard at mike@advancedaviationinc.com=
 
Colyn
 
------=_NextPart_000_0CD6_01C5B789.42600A00--