X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [66.174.90.204] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0c2)
  with HTTP id 719259 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:45:58 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Another way to look at the Innodyne
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0c2
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:45:58 -0400
Message-ID: <web-719259@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <017801c5b7a1$90174930$0300a8c0@VAIO>
References: <017801c5b7a1$90174930$0300a8c0@VAIO>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Bryan J. Burr" <bjburr@mwheli.com>:

  I really don't have much experience with the Pratt products.  They
  didn't do much with helicopter applications except for the BELL 212 twin
  engine aircraft.  In comparison the PT6 would be much more expensive and
  much more powerful.  I don't think it would be a good fit for the
  Lancair aircraft.
  
  I know that recently a Garrett was installed in a IVP.
  
  Bryan

"""
     thanks for the info on the 250C20R.
     In your experience, how did it compare to a pt6 in reliability?
"""