Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.38]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:39:23 -0400 Received: from ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com ([12.73.160.134]) by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP id <19990817234254.OWAQ5700@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 23:42:54 +0000 Message-ID: <000801bee908$ea907b20$86a0490c@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> Reply-To: "Curtis Krouse" From: "Curtis Krouse" To: Subject: Re: 360 vs Legacy 2000 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:33:29 -0700 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ed, I agree with you and your assessment. Mine, however, is for slightly different reasons. The aerobatic is one. But, the next is the cost to finish the airframe. I don't know how much a turbocharged 360 costs, but I'm sure it's much more than the rebuilt 320/360 that I can put in my airframe. Another thing is that I'm not sure that I really want to go that fast. Is that confirmed though that the 320/360 kit is no longer for sale? Curtis N753K >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html