X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 15:22:26 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-640295@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.7)
  with ESMTPS id 640292 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 15:15:33 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com
Received: (qmail 14431 invoked by uid 2520); 7 Aug 2005 14:14:47 -0500
Received: from 68.225.96.105 by secure5.liveoakhosting.com (envelope-from <walter@advancedpilot.com>, uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-1.25st 
 (clamdscan: 0.84/921. perlscan: 1.25st.  
 Clear:RC:0(68.225.96.105):. 
 Processed in 0.053316 secs); 07 Aug 2005 19:14:47 -0000
Received: from ip68-225-96-105.br.no.cox.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (68.225.96.105)
  by rs5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 14:14:47 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
In-Reply-To: <list-640267@logan.com>
References: <list-640267@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-5--894001776
X-Original-Message-Id: <4208635cb45d915673c0d20f3b7ce34e@advancedpilot.com>
From: Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lower Cowl Air Temperature - Induction Air - Heater Air Temp
X-Original-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:14:46 -0500
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622)


--Apple-Mail-5--894001776
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed

<hehehehe>

Yep, the purpose of the carb atomization is to make smaller droplets=20
that then can be more easily vaporized while the F:A mixture is still=20
in the induction system.  The better that is accomplished, the better=20
the F:A balance between cylinders.

Walter


On Aug 7, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote:


In a message dated 8/7/2005 10:22:28 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20
marv@lancaironline.net writes:
> Besides a carb ATOMIZES the air, it does not vaporize it.
Yes, you're right - A nuclear reaction vaporizes things around it.
=A0
Scott=

--Apple-Mail-5--894001776
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=ISO-8859-1

<<hehehehe>


Yep, the purpose of the carb atomization is to make smaller droplets
that then can be more easily vaporized while the F:A mixture is still
in the induction system.  The better that is accomplished, the better
the F:A balance between cylinders.


Walter



On Aug 7, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote:



<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>In a message dated 8/7/2005
10:22:28 A.M. Central Standard Time, marv@lancaironline.net =
writes:</smaller></fontfamily>

<excerpt><fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Besides a carb
ATOMIZES the air, it does not vaporize it.</smaller></fontfamily>

</excerpt><fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Yes, you're right -
A nuclear reaction vaporizes things around it.</smaller></fontfamily>

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>=A0</smaller></fontfamily>

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Scott</smaller></fontfamily>=

--Apple-Mail-5--894001776--