X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [161.88.255.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3.6) with HTTP id 1033960 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:25:42 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Turbo loss consequences? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3.6 Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:25:42 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "George Braly" : Ron, Because loss of compressed air from a turbo is most often a result of a loss of integrity in the induction system, rather than the exhaust system, I think it is bad policy to just automatically shut an engine down in the face of loss of MP. Let me suggest that you should fly an airplane with an adequate firewall, or you should not have a turbo. With that in mind, then we teach pilots 1) to reduce power to the minimum required to maintain altitude. 2) To divert towards the nearest suitable landing location; 3) To descend to the minimum altitude required for reasonable terrain clearance and from which an emergency landing could be made in the event of fire; 4) Continue to monitor the engine and at the first indication of smoke or fire, to then treat the matter as a fire emergency, using the POH engine fire procedure. Doing 1 & 3 above will dramatically reduce the pressure in the exhaust system and dramatically reduce the possibility of engine compartment fire in the event the source of the problem is an exhaust system failure. Regards, George