Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [161.88.255.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3.6)
  with HTTP id 1032973 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:31:08 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Turbo loss consequences?
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3.6
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:31:08 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1032973@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <42CBC559.9010006@ustek.com>
References: <list-1032576@logan.com>
 <42CBC559.9010006@ustek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for N301ES <lancair@ustek.com>:

  Colyn,
  
  
  Thanks for the input.  I was thinking that if I were to lose both turbos 
that
I'd have a NA aircraft, but with one still running I'd have half-boost minus
some loss.  Seems like this is a condition that someone has already evaluated
either on a test stand or on paper.  Oh well, I'll keep looking!
  
  Robert