X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 13:03:30 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from esmtp.cave.com ([66.35.72.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 1031892 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:48:42 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.35.72.5; envelope-from=lancair@ustek.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([66.35.73.227]) by esmtp.cave.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v7.2.4.1) with ASMTP id CQN38002 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:47:45 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <42CAABA7.5080006@ustek.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:47:51 -0400 From: N301ES Reply-To: lancair@ustek.com Organization: USTEK Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Turbo loss consequences? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Perhaps the LML could enlighten me, as I have found the data nowhere printed: If one of the twin turbos on a Cont TSIO550 were to crap out, 1.) what would be the new critical altitude for 75% power? 2.) what would be the new critical altitude for an 8,500 ft cabin pressure? Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES