X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:00:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta-out-1.udlp.com ([207.109.1.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1011282 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:27:05 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.109.1.8; envelope-from=Christopher.Zavatson@udlp.com Received: from asdmngwia.udlp.com (asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com [10.1.62.22]) by mta-out-1.udlp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5ND7Tu2024340 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:07:29 -0500 Received: from DM-MN-06-MTA by asdmngwia.udlp.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:26:15 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.4 X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:26:37 -0500 From: "Christopher Zavatson" X-Original-To: Subject: [LML] Re: Induction air filter Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline George, << Did you have a six probe EGT/CHT instrument?>> Four probe JPI EDM 700 - I wish I had six cylinders=20 =20 << Did you notice that the CHT went up?>> No I didn't, but then again I wasn't actively trying to compare like EGTs, = altitude and OAT to see if the combination was producing higher than = normal CHTs. The delta, if there was one, was small enough that I didn't = suspect anything. I often wondered if all the damage occurred only = during take-offs at high power. The transient nature at takeoff would = have more easily masked a higher than normal CHT. This was late summer = with OATs in the 90's-100's.=20 =20 Chris Zavatson N91CZ 360std