Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #30538
From: Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Induction air filter
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:27:59 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
No.  It did not.  It was simply filter drag. Induction path wasn't part of the test.

Walter


On Jun 22, 2005, at 12:46 PM, <dskeele@bellsouth.net> wrote:

 Walter,
     Did your flow tests include a 90 degree turn with the entrance losses associated with us updraft carb types ?? It was the return to laminar flow that suported Vans' data..  Thx for the interest...  Don Skeele

From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Date: 2005/06/22 Wed AM 10:26:38 EDT
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [LML] Re: Induction air filter

Posted for Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>:

FWIW, I ran a test.

  1) MP measured with NO FILTER AT ALL.

  2) MP measured with paper filter.

  3) MP measured with bracket filter

  4) MP measured with K&N filter.


  They resulted in the following order of MP, from highest to lowest:

  NO filter, PAPER filter, K&N filter, BRACKET filter.   The two middle ones
were very close to the same--frankly, too close to call as being any
different.

  YMMV.

  Walter



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster