X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:00:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta10.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.202] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 981999 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 10:12:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.202; envelope-from=glcasey@adelphia.net Received: from worldwinds ([70.34.91.48]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050602141210.ZJDD17140.mta10.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:12:10 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: Dead Battery X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:07:55 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal <> Now all these posts are getting me confused. I can't figure out what "required" equipment didn't work. The plane had both a battery and an alternator that were functional. All instruments were working. The only regulation, then, that might apply is the one about "unairworthy", but that one leaves it up to the pilot to determine, once all regulation line items have been complied with, are there any other factors that would make the plane "unairworthy." I can't come up with any from the information I have, so it looks to me like Lorn's flight was completely within regulations and furthermore was adequately safe. I'll bet that virtually everyone has encountered a difficult engine starting situation where the engine finally started on the battery's last gasp and then took off without a second thought. Given all the nay-saying comments on the list every time the engine takes more than a normal cranking time the flight should be scrubbed as one would certainly be taking off with less than a full charge in the battery. There may be a regulation that says that there should be a functioning battery in the plane, but I can't find one that gives a minimum charge condition at takeoff. I still believe that taking off into IMC conditions would be unwise, but in VMC (even if operating IFR) I just don't see the problem. Gary Casey