X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:07:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 981577 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 22:53:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net Received: from john-study.home_wireless (dsl-208-26-41-105.perigee.net [208.26.41.105]) by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j522r8Mi007446 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:53:12 -0400 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Stability of the Legacy FG References: X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 22:53:07 -0400 From: "John Schroeder" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3929) On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:32:24 -0400, Bill Kennedy wrote: > I suspect the Legacy is a goosy little speedster like the 320. A joy to > fly, but not stable like the C182. Take your pick, but you can't have > both Bill - How 'bout a Lancair Super ES? :-)) I'd say it is much closer to "both" than not. Cheers, John --