X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 22:22:17 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from HQEMGATE03.nvidia.com ([216.228.112.143] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.2) with ESMTP id 966811 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 28 May 2005 19:08:15 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.228.112.143; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from hqemfe02.nvidia.com (Not Verified[172.16.227.92]) by HQEMGATE03.nvidia.com id ; Sat, 28 May 2005 16:07:30 -0700 Received: from thelma.nvidia.com ([172.16.228.84]) by hqemfe02.nvidia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 28 May 2005 16:07:30 -0700 Received: from ccaselt (cvpn2-4-113.nvidia.com [10.2.4.113]) by thelma.nvidia.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA05222 for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 16:07:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <0c4c01c563da$05c7aec0$9311020a@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: B&C BC-100 Battery X-Original-Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 16:07:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0C49_01C5639F.58852D80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Original-Return-Path: colyncase@earthlink.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 May 2005 23:07:30.0564 (UTC) FILETIME=[060FB440:01C563DA] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0C49_01C5639F.58852D80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I believe that was Shannon's response till the very end as well. Good luck. Hamid Making suggestions toward safer policies seems like a useful thing to = do. Condemnation seems less useful. Especially when it serves to inhibit = free exchange of information. I may agree or disagree with the pilot's decisions in this case but I'm = glad the post was there. I learned something about batteries and thermal characteristics. =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0C49_01C5639F.58852D80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I believe=20 that was Shannon's response till the very end as well.

Good=20 luck.

Hamid

Making=20 suggestions toward safer policies seems like a useful thing to=20 do.

Condemnation=20 seems less useful. Especially when it serves to inhibit free = exchange of=20 information.

I may agree or disagree with the pilot's decisions in this case but = I'm=20 glad the post was there.

I learned something about batteries and thermal=20 characteristics.

------=_NextPart_000_0C49_01C5639F.58852D80--