X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 09:35:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta9.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 943619 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 14 May 2005 03:32:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.199; envelope-from=dfs155@adelphia.net Received: from f3g6s4 ([67.22.49.202]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050514073200.DBYK8952.mta9.adelphia.net@f3g6s4> for ; Sat, 14 May 2005 03:32:00 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <016a01c55856$fcb3ca00$ca311643@losaca.adelphia.net> From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: Re: Shannon's Accident Summarized X-Original-Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 00:31:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 I waited until most of you commented to see what was said, and was enlightened by some and somewhat disappointed by others. Enlightened by reading posts by Brent and Hamid and others - disappointed that no one mentioned something I think is poorly appreciated - and sorely lacking in most of the training available to the "average GA pilot". That is the undeniable fact that when an anomaly occurs, decisions made early on will very likely decide the outcome. In other words, a decision made10 minutes ago (or in some cases,10 days ago) will become irrevocable with the passage of time - good decision: reasonable chance of good outcome, bad decision: pretty good chance of a bad outcome. When the altitude (engine, gas, luck - whatever) runs out, there's no going back and reconsidering. Waiting a while to figure out what to do is a form of decision too and the clock starts ticking when things go to hell in a handbasket - not necessarily when you make a concious decision on a course of action. IMHO, we often spend a lot of time and effort during recurrent training to get numbers, procedures, airspeeds, etc., etc. down pat, and that's important. However, good recurrent training (in my opinion) has as it's fundamental goal the ability for you, The Decision Maker (i.e. PIC), to know what to do in an emergency to make a good decision, and then to do it QUICKLY without eating into your critical decision time. I don't know how much, if ever, this thinking enters into our training. You don't get a "Do over" when your engine swallows a valve and you decide to fly past a useable runway and then change your mind too long after your initial decision. Dan Schaefer