X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.163.227] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c5) with HTTP id 943464 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 May 2005 21:38:56 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: new regs To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c5 Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 21:38:56 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <04a001c55811$327ae3d0$0200a8c0@S0030046211> References: <04a001c55811$327ae3d0$0200a8c0@S0030046211> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "nkanagy" : This notice is forboding for what will certainly happen if the industry (us) will not police themselves (ourselves). While I feel like agreeing about commenting to the powers that be, in many ways I cant believe that some form of this hasnt happend before now. It's crazy to think of jumping into some plane and thinking you can fly it just because you can build (or buy) it. No logic there at all. Nathan Kanagy """ The Notice 8700.42, is not a FAR rule and is only advisory in nature. The notices are for information and cannot be used in any enforcement case. Trying to enforce a Notice is like trying to enforce an Advisory Circular they are for information only. Your phase 1 and 2 limitations are what you have to go by. Until part 61 is changed nothing will happen. However I think all pilots should send a comment to the FAA or your local congress person stating how you feel about the FAA changing rules. The squeaky wheel gets greases so to speak. """