|
|
These four rules would keep you out of a lot of trouble. I know that the third one works well substituting weather, pilot, maintenance etc for "plane". We could get rid of a lot of the "joe bag of donuts" if they would ask this question about someone who comes for a BFR, IPC, etc. I know I have, and ask some pretty peeved pilots to come back for more training. The fact that the are peeved is just further confirmation of my decision.
Nathan Kanagy
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:00 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Shannon's Accident Summarized
Posted for "Bryan J. Burr" <bjburr@mwheli.com>:
Thanks Brent.
Perhaps the 4 rules could be a beginning to the "Statement Higher
Standards" that we could adopt to collectively eliminate future losses.
Bryan
N132BB
"""
Rule #1) All anomalous events REQUIRE investigation.
Rule #2) Uttering the phrase "Whatever that was, I am sure it is not a
problem" is NOT a repair.
Rule #3) Before a flight, ask yourself if you would let your wife /
child / parent fly that plane without you on board.
Rule #4) The urge to ask for a second opinion is confirmation that there
is an actual problem. See rule #1.
"""
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
|
|