Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 21:38:10 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-943461@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.30; envelope-from=nkanagy@cox.net
From: "nkanagy" <nkanagy@cox.net>
References: <list-940293@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Shannon's Accident Summarized
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

These four rules would keep you out of a lot of trouble. I know that the 
third one works well substituting weather, pilot, maintenance etc for 
"plane". We could get rid of a lot of the "joe bag of donuts" if they would 
ask this question about someone who comes for a BFR, IPC, etc.  I know I 
have, and ask some pretty peeved pilots to come back for more training. The 
fact that the are peeved is just further confirmation of my decision.

Nathan Kanagy


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:00 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Shannon's Accident Summarized


> Posted for "Bryan J. Burr" <bjburr@mwheli.com>:
>
>  Thanks Brent.
>  Perhaps the 4 rules could be a beginning to the "Statement Higher
>  Standards" that we could adopt to collectively eliminate future losses.
>  Bryan
>  N132BB
>
> """
>  Rule #1) All anomalous events REQUIRE investigation.
>  Rule #2) Uttering the phrase "Whatever that was, I am sure it is not a
>  problem" is NOT a repair.
>  Rule #3) Before a flight, ask yourself if you would let your wife /
>  child / parent fly that plane without you on board.
>  Rule #4) The urge to ask for a second opinion is confirmation that there
>  is an actual problem. See rule #1.
> """
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
>