X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 21:35:16 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from lakermmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.240.30] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 942861 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:22:38 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.30; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from OFFICE ([68.110.249.147]) by lakermmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050513172150.UVPE6804.lakermmtao09.cox.net@OFFICE> for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:21:50 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <005e01c557e0$1017c050$6401a8c0@OFFICE> From: "Bill&Sue" <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: new regs X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:20:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005B_01C557BE.88C82CF0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C557BE.88C82CF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Bryan, Chris, >=20 > Am I missing something here? Does this discussion imply that=20 > homebuilders were in some way exempt from rating requirements? It=20 > sounds that its water under the bridge anyway. Curious what I'm = missing? >=20 > Larry Henney >=20 Yep Larry, we were. Up until now, if you built a Seven Engine Flymaster = but only had a single engine rating...no problemo as far as flying = passengers. Now, you either have to have a multi engine rating or jump = through the hoops that have been specified in several previous posts. (I = know that you have a multi engine rating, so keep on working on that = Flymaster!) Bill Harrelson 5zq@cox.net N5ZQ 320 980 hrs N6ZQ IV 1% (until this weekend when Rick and Pete will bring it = up to 90%) ------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C557BE.88C82CF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Bryan, Chris,
>
> Am = I missing=20 something here?  Does this discussion imply that
> = homebuilders were=20 in some way exempt from rating requirements?  It
> sounds = that its=20 water under the bridge anyway.  Curious what I'm missing?
> =
>=20 Larry Henney
>
 
 
Yep Larry, we were. Up = until now, if=20 you built a Seven Engine Flymaster but only had a single = engine=20 rating...no problemo as far as flying passengers. Now, you either have = to have a=20 multi engine rating or jump through the hoops that have been = specified in=20 several previous posts. (I know that you have a multi engine = rating, so=20 keep on working on that Flymaster!)
 
Bill = Harrelson
N5ZQ   320  980=20 hrs
N6ZQ    = IV  =20 1%    (until this weekend when Rick and Pete will bring = it up to=20 90%)
------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C557BE.88C82CF0--