X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:04:22 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-942689@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <ben@gmpexpress.net>
Received: from [216.52.118.220] (HELO cluster1.echolabs.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5)
  with ESMTP id 942659 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 May 2005 10:51:45 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.52.118.220; envelope-from=ben@gmpexpress.net
X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Clamd http://www.messagepartners.com
X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Cloudmark http://www.messagepartners.com
Received: from [72.9.22.171] (HELO ben22d25bef6f7)
  by fe2.cluster1.echolabs.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with SMTP id 47477424 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 May 2005 10:50:59 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <000d01c557cb$2e8ff0d0$ab160948@ben22d25bef6f7>
From: "Ben Baltrusaitis" <ben@gmpexpress.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-942596@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: new regs
X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 10:51:00 -0400
Organization: Biper Marketing Company
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C557A9.A6413CF0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C557A9.A6413CF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Here is a reply from an FAA man:

The Notice 8700.42, is not a FAR rule and is only advisory in nature. =
The notices are for information and cannot be used in any enforcement =
case. Trying to enforce a Notice is like trying to enforce an Advisory =
Circular they are for information only.
Your phase 1 and 2 limitations are what you have to go by. Until part 61 =
is changed nothing will happen. However I think all pilots should send a =
comment to the FAA or your local congress person stating how you feel =
about the FAA changing rules. The squeaky wheel gets greases so to =
speak.

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: lhenney@attg.net=20
  To: Lancair Mailing List=20
  Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:42 AM
  Subject: [LML] Re: new regs


  Bryan, Chris,

  Am I missing something here?  Does this discussion imply that=20
  homebuilders were in some way exempt from rating requirements?  It=20
  sounds that its water under the bridge anyway.  Curious what I'm =
missing?

  Larry Henney


  --
  For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/


  --=20
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.9 - Release Date: 5/12/2005


------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C557A9.A6413CF0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#c0dcc0>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#800000><FONT color=3D#000000>Here is a reply from an =
FAA=20
man:<BR><BR>The Notice 8700.42, is not a FAR rule and is only advisory =
in=20
nature. The notices are for information and cannot be used in any =
enforcement=20
case. Trying to enforce a Notice is like trying to enforce an Advisory =
Circular=20
they are for information only.<BR>Your phase 1 and 2 limitations are =
what you=20
have to go by. Until part 61 is changed nothing will happen. However I =
think all=20
pilots should send a comment to the FAA or your local congress person =
stating=20
how you feel about the FAA changing rules. The squeaky wheel gets =
greases so to=20
speak.</FONT><BR></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #800000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dlhenney@attg.net =
href=3D"mailto:lhenney@attg.net">lhenney@attg.net</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dlml@lancaironline.net=20
  href=3D"mailto:lml@lancaironline.net">Lancair Mailing List</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 13, 2005 =
10:42 AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [LML] Re: new =
regs</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>Bryan, Chris,<BR><BR>Am I missing something here?&nbsp; =
Does=20
  this discussion imply that <BR>homebuilders were in some way exempt =
from=20
  rating requirements?&nbsp; It <BR>sounds that its water under the =
bridge=20
  anyway.&nbsp; Curious what I'm missing?<BR><BR>Larry=20
  Henney<BR><BR><BR>--<BR>For archives and unsub <A=20
  =
href=3D"http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/">http://mail.lancaironli=
ne.net/lists/lml/</A><BR><BR><BR>--=20
  <BR>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG=20
  Anti-Virus.<BR>Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.9 - Release =
Date:=20
  5/12/2005<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C557A9.A6413CF0--