X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 10:50:14 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTPS id 942551 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 May 2005 09:50:51 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: (qmail 27256 invoked by uid 2520); 13 May 2005 13:50:04 -0000 Received: from 70.177.44.136 by secure5.liveoakhosting.com (envelope-from , uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.84/871. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(70.177.44.136):. Processed in 0.123253 secs); 13 May 2005 13:50:04 -0000 Received: from ip70-177-44-136.br.br.cox.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (70.177.44.136) by secure5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 13 May 2005 13:50:04 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3-246050030 X-Original-Message-Id: <436fc1f581a65ca33f48577e22a69963@advancedpilot.com> From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Electronic Ignition Timing Charts X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:50:03 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) --Apple-Mail-3-246050030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Scott: Since the issue where destruction is concerned is the peak pressure,=20 why not just MEASURE that rather than use a batch of sensors to=20 calculate it? If you also measure thetaPP, you have all of the information you need=20 to get max torque AND stay under the destruction point. Walter On May 12, 2005, at 8:18 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 5/12/2005 10:21:35 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 walter@advancedpilot.com writes: > As it turns out, this is a major effect.=A0 You must quantify how rich > and how lean for the second statement to be accurate.=A0 There are = some > rich mixtures that burn slower than some lean mixtures.=A0 As a matter = of > fact, 40dF ROP is the fastest burn rate mixture. > > The charts you posted are true for a given mixture.=A0 As the mixture > changes, the chart values would change.=A0 Mixture has a major effect = on > the effective timing...=A0 which is the only thing we really care = about. Walter, =A0 Yeah, well I remember a GAMI chart that shows a broad range of timing=20 with little or no effect on destruction.=A0 I don't have any problem = with=20 self-controlling the last knob (mixture)=A0in the "best power" combo=20 although I would prefer some useful info from something like an exhaust=20= O2 sensor, mass airflow sensor, temperature sensor - all helping with=20 data=A0to arrive at some non-destructive highest and best=A0power = setting=20 for the extant=A0environmental and operating conditions.=A0 All I have = to=20 do is figure out what "is" is.=A0 Maybe I need a theta-beta-zeta = cylinder=20 wall distortion sensor. =A0 OK, 40F ROP is the fastest burn rate.=A0 What is a non-destructive LOP=20= slower rate and what is the timing spread contribution (even a rule of=20= thumb would do)=A0-- or do I have to deduce this by myself in the = "flight=20 experimental" mode?=A0 Half the EI folk don't want to reveal the timing=20= curves while, at least in one case, with enough work one can discover=20 it. =A0 BTW, Some of us are still waiting for something like a real FADEC,=20 PRISM, EPIC, OPUS, ERATO, CROSSWORD PUZZLE or whatever - - (kinda like=20= a useful diesel), but they never seem to quite arrive and deliver the=20 desired=A0performance.=A0 Of course, one would expect these things to be=20= developed in the "experimental" field before someone tries to jam=20 another fix-up on a Bonanza. =A0 I guess I am going to try things at ROP first - then LOP over a string=20= of airports. =A0 I like this stuff, it tears at my orderly life. =A0 =A0 Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) Training is no substitute for fear,risk analysis and judgement. Recognize the links in the chain of errors before the last link joins=20 to the anchor. In aviation, as in life, nothing fixes itself. There ain't no tow truck when you are positive AGL. --Apple-Mail-3-246050030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Scott: Since the issue where destruction is concerned is the peak pressure, why not just MEASURE that rather than use a batch of sensors to calculate it? If you also measure thetaPP, you have all of the information you need to get max torque AND stay under the destruction point. Walter On May 12, 2005, at 8:18 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: ArialIn a message dated 5/12/2005 10:21:35 A.M. Central Standard Time, walter@advancedpilot.com = writes: ArialAs it turns out, this is a major effect.=A0 You must quantify how = rich Arialand how lean for the second statement to be accurate.=A0 There are some Arialrich mixtures that burn slower than some lean mixtures.=A0 As a matter of = Arialfact, 40dF ROP is the fastest burn rate mixture. ArialThe charts you posted are true for a given mixture.=A0 As the mixture Arialchanges, the chart values would change.=A0 Mixture has a major effect on Arialthe effective timing...=A0 which is the only thing we really care about. = ArialWalter, Arial=A0 ArialYeah, well I remember a GAMI chart that shows a broad range of timing with little or no effect on destruction.=A0 I don't have any problem with self-controlling the last knob (mixture)=A0in the "best power" combo although I would prefer some useful info from something like an exhaust O2 sensor, mass airflow sensor, temperature sensor - all helping with data=A0to arrive at some non-destructive highest and best=A0power setting for the extant=A0environmental and operating conditions.=A0 All I have to do is figure out what "is" is.=A0 Maybe I need a theta-beta-zeta cylinder wall distortion sensor. Arial=A0 ArialOK, 40F ROP is the fastest burn rate.=A0 What is a non-destructive LOP slower rate and what is the timing spread contribution (even a rule of thumb would do)=A0-- or do I have to deduce this by myself in the "flight experimental" mode?=A0 Half the EI folk don't want to reveal the timing curves while, at least in one case, with enough work one can discover it. Arial=A0 ArialBTW, Some of us are still waiting for something like a real FADEC, PRISM, EPIC, OPUS, ERATO, CROSSWORD PUZZLE or whatever - - (kinda like a useful diesel), but they never seem to quite arrive and deliver the desired=A0performance.=A0 Of course, one would expect these things to be developed in the "experimental" field before someone tries to jam another fix-up on a Bonanza. Arial=A0 ArialI guess I am going to try things at ROP first - then LOP over a string of = airports. Arial=A0 ArialI like this stuff, it tears at my orderly life. Arial=A0 Arial=A0 ArialScott Krueger AKA = Grayhawk ArialLancair N92EX IO320 SB = 89/96 ArialAurora, IL = (KARR) ArialTraining is no substitute for fear,risk analysis and judgement. ArialRecognize the links in the chain of errors before the last link joins to the = anchor. ArialIn aviation, as in life, nothing fixes itself. ArialThere ain't no tow truck when you are positive AGL. --Apple-Mail-3-246050030--