Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #29845
From: Craig Berland <cberland@systems3.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [LML] Re: Plasma III on Hi Compression Engines
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:24:37 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

"I put those two pieces of information together and reach the conclusion that if there are ways to operate the engine at high power but minimize the peak torsionals,  then that method ought to be used. I’m not sure I answered your question.  If not, let me try again. Regards,  George"

Yes you did answer my question...thanks.  One more.  How much of a tight rope are we walking with the TSIO550 trying to balance peak pressure and TIT?  Well, two questions.  I have discussed with some the advisability of raising the compression ratio on the TSIO550 and I advised against it. The quest for efficiency is outweighed by the quest for durability. What do you think?  A similar question.  Would you advise retarding the timing if Scot's engine was stock CR?  Retard 2 to 3 deg's more at 9 to 1 and 5 to 7 deg's more at 10 to 1???  If this is so, then stock CR is the way to go. Finally let me say I believe there are lots of variables that affect engine durability like oil type and viscosity, engine component balance and prop balance to name a few. So this is not a discussion on whether or not Scott or someone else should run a given CR. I'm trying to isolate and understand a given engine calibration feature and I'm most interested in the TSIO550.

Craig Berland

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster