Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.227] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c3)
  with HTTP id 828458 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:21:06 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Alternative Engines
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c3
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:21:06 -0500
Message-ID: <web-828458@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <001301c5342b$65979c40$660610ac@dslverizon.net>
References: <list-827639@logan.com>
 <001301c5342b$65979c40$660610ac@dslverizon.net>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Tom Gourley" <tom.gourley@verizon.net>:

  This is certainly not a scientific or engineering observation, but it based
  on articles an accident reports I've read over the last several years it
  seems like the PSRU is usually the weak link when using an engine that
  develops the horsepower you'd like at high RPMs.
  
  Tom Gourley
  

>   Bit of a subject change, if you're up for it--I wanted to get your
  feedback
> on alternative engines.  Specifically, it seems to me that the GM
> LS1/LS2/LS6/LS7 engines are real candidates for high performance aircraft,
  say
> Legacy/LIV/LIVP.