Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.227] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c3)
  with HTTP id 828125 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:23:02 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Alternative Engines
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c3
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:23:02 -0500
Message-ID: <web-828125@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <37e05145ea5e1e2d6bb2289983499569@advancedpilot.com>
References: <list-827639@logan.com>
 <37e05145ea5e1e2d6bb2289983499569@advancedpilot.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>:

  Will:
  
  There are significant issues to overcome.  Weight.  Tolerances for the
extreme conditions. BSFC, to name a few.
  
  Walter
  
  
"""
    Bit of a subject change, if you're up for it--I wanted to get your
  feedback
  on alternative engines.  Specifically, it seems to me that the GM
  LS1/LS2/LS6/LS7 engines are real candidates for high performance aircraft,
say
  Legacy/LIV/LIVP.
"""