Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:19:40 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 823048 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:10:36 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.29; envelope-from=WarbirdAeroPress@cox.net Received: from DELL ([24.251.57.131]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050326200947.LVFT2123.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@DELL> for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:09:47 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <017001c5323f$c0afead0$6401a8c0@DELL> From: "Scotty G" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: SuperFil vs. Aeropoxy Light X-Original-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:09:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_016D_01C53205.1424ABA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_016D_01C53205.1424ABA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable With all of this talk about sanding and epoxy, I thought I would chime = in with my two cents. I'm not a builder, I'm an owner/pilot with a 360. I am in the process of = painting my airplane; in fact, we shot white today. I spent almost every = day off (3 a week) and many evenings over the past three months sanding = off my previous two paint schemes and preping for new paint. I'm not sure if sanding sucks or blows. Either way, the next time I say = I want to paint an airplane, somebody please smack me upside the head. Having said that, I used the SuperFil and I thought it worked very well, = and was very easy to sand. It is also easy to mix, although I thought it = could have applied better. Overall, I give it high marks. I also used West Systems epoxy - with both slow and fast hardeners and = micro / flox. Its easy to mix with a scale and sands quite well after = setting up. These are the only items I have used so far, but for a = non-builder/newbie point of view - there you go. Scotty G www.UnleashedAirRacing.com www.WarbirdAeroPress.com www.DagoRed-AirRacing.com All mail is scanned for viruses. ------=_NextPart_000_016D_01C53205.1424ABA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
With all of this talk about sanding = and epoxy, I=20 thought I would chime in with my two cents.
 
I'm not a builder, I'm an owner/pilot = with a 360.=20 I am in the process of painting my airplane; in fact, we shot white = today. I=20 spent almost every day off (3 a week) and many evenings over the past = three=20 months sanding off my previous two paint schemes and preping for = new=20 paint.
 
I'm not sure if sanding sucks or = blows. Either=20 way, the next time I say I want to paint an airplane, somebody please = smack me=20 upside the head.
 
Having said that, I used the SuperFil = and I=20 thought it worked very well, and was very easy to sand. It is also easy = to mix,=20 although I thought it could have applied better. Overall, I give it high = marks.
 
I also used West Systems epoxy - with = both slow=20 and fast hardeners and micro / flox. Its easy to mix with a scale and = sands=20 quite well after setting up.
 
These are the only items I have used = so far, but=20 for a non-builder/newbie point of view - there you go.

Scotty G
www.UnleashedAirRacing.com=
www.WarbirdAeroPress.com
= www.DagoRed-AirRacing.com
 
All mail is scanned for viruses.
------=_NextPart_000_016D_01C53205.1424ABA0--