Return-Path: Received: from [161.88.255.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.8) with HTTP id 611537 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:00:16 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Approach control To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.8 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:00:16 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <000b01c4fd6c$9d8b8bc0$6501a8c0@PhiPounder> References: <000b01c4fd6c$9d8b8bc0$6501a8c0@PhiPounder> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Wally Bestgen" : Alain, I do not doubt you when you have experienced ATC slang when communicating with LAX ATC . I have flown into LAX for the past 30 years during the at time I have never experienced slang used to that extreme. I have experienced controller going out of there way to slow communications with foreign carriers that my be having a language problem. Perhaps you English is so accomplished the controller took a liberty that was not justified. I can also report that when I fly to CDG that I never experience ATC slang. But then how would I know, they were speaking French. Hmmm I guess it was ICAO standard French. Wally Bestgen